Legal Opinion
Cline v. 1-888-Plumbing Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 2001No. 99 CIV 1401 RJWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Beth Cline cross-moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Defendants 1-888-PLUMB-ING Group, Inc. (“Plumbing Group”), Frank Campisi, and Bruni & Campisi Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (“BCPHI”) cross-move to amend their pleadings pursuant to Rule 15(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs cross-motion is denied and Defendants’ cross-motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants infringed on Plaintiffs registered service mark “1-800-PLUMBING” in…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. Filene's Basement, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. WhenU. ComDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Friesland Brands, B v. v. Vietnam National Milk Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- New York Stock Exchange, Inc. v. GaharyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.