Legal Opinion

United States v. Sippel

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 26, 1954No. 2689PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. LatimeR, Judge:

The accused was tried by general court-martial at Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, D. C., and was found guilty of offenses proscribed by Articles of War 95 and 96, 10 USC §§ 1567, 1568, and Article 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 701. He was sentenced to be dismissed from the service and to forfeit all pay and allowances. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence and a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force affirmed. On May 27, 1953, we granted accused’s petition for review,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Coleman v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. SpellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. CaputoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. WoodsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API