Legal Opinion
Continental Access Control Systems, Inc. v. Racal-Vikonics, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 82-0263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has submitted to the Court a motion to compel the production of documents addressed to the defendant, defendant responded and oral argument was heard. Defense counsel objected to seven of the eight requests as extremely broad and irrelevant to the subject matter. I am granting plaintiff’s motion as to request number four limited herein and denying the motion as to the other requests. The request for an award of counsel fees for the filing of this motion pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(a)(4) is denied.
Courts have held that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In re Folding Carton Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Weahkee v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & GreavesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Williams v. American CyanamidDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Republic Environmental Systems, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hall v. Harleysville Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.