Legal Opinion

In re Folding Carton Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 29, 1979No. MDL No. 250PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 55

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBSON and WILL, Senior District Judges.

This cause is before the court on the motion of defendants to compel answers to defendants’ second wave interrogatories: second set. For the reasons hereinafter stated, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Defendants filed second wave interrogatories to obtain general information and specific data concerning plaintiffs’ purchasing practices of folding cartons and to identify plaintiffs affiliated with a folding carton supplier, plaintiffs’ employees with experience in the folding carton…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tora C. Brennan v. Midwestern United Life Insurance Company, Appeal of Claude M. Herriman, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. 58.16 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1975
  3. Fischer v. WolfinbargerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1971
  4. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Sunbeam Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API