Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Seattle Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1905No. 5485PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered October 28, 1904, dismissing an action for damages for wrongful death, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The plaintiffs in this action are, respectively, the surviving husband and minor son of Mattie Johnson, deceased. They jointly brought this action to iccover damages on account of the death of said Mattie Johnson. They allege that death resulted from injuries received by her in a street railway accident, in Seattle, while she was a pasf senger upon one of the defendant’s cars. In addition to *212general damages, the plaintiffs allege that they have incurred great expense in and about the funeral and burial of the deceased, and that they have been damaged thereby.

The defendant demurred to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Noble v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. In re the Estate of FeasWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Limekiller v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Robinson v. BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas West Oil & Gas Corp. v. First Interstate Bank of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Howe v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Kennedy Oil v. LANCE OIL & GAS COMPANYWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Russell v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API