Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Steele

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The appellant (one of the three defendants) does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to establish negligence, proximate cause and the awarded damages, but contends that the record contains no substantial evidence indicating that the defendants Steele and Bewley, mentioned in the preceding statement of facts, and who were the sole occupants of the truck which collided with the car in which the plaintiff was riding, were appellant’s agents. It further contends that if a conclusion is warranted that these two individuals were the agents of the appellant, the record contains no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Texas Co. v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Zeeb v. BahnmaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Harrison v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. Texas Co. v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  4. LaBarge v. United InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dewitt v. Sandy Market, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API