Legal Opinion
Doe v. Keller
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 14, 2003No. 01-P-1074PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The defendants, Samuel Keller and Richard Sommi, appeal from the allowance of the plaintiff’s request to make permanent a restraining order issued against the defendants.
On December 28, 1998, the plaintiff filed a complaint under G. L. c. 209A for restraining orders against the defendants, *777individually, claiming rape, physical abuse, and threats on his Ufe. The plaintiff obtained ex parte orders which, after a hearing on January 7, 1999,3 were extended to January 7, 2000, by a judge of the Orleans District Court. The defendants were ordered to refrain from abusing the plaintiff and not to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Crenshaw v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Pike v. MaguireMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. McCourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SicilianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iamele v. AsselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Vittone v. ClairmontMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Mitchell v. MitchellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- C.C. v. C.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- J.S. v. J.G.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018