Legal Opinion

Pike v. Maguire

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 27, 1999No. 97-P-1690PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record belies the claim of the defendant, Michael J. Maguire, that he was denied a fair hearing on November 22, 1996, and December 18, 1996, with respect to the issue whether the G. L. c. 209A restraining order obtained by his ex-wife, Marilyn J. Pike, one year earlier should be extended or made permanent. As the Probate Court judge correctly noted in denying the defendant’s motion for reconsideration of her November 22, 1996, issuance of a permanent restraining order, she conducted evidentiary hearings on both dates, taking evidence from both parties on November 22 and hearing testimony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Custody of VaughnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Zullo v. GoguenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  4. Wooldridge v. HickeyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Smith v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Iamele v. AsselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Ginsberg v. BlackerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  3. Vittone v. ClairmontMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. E.C.O. v. ComptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API