Legal Opinion

State v. Bair

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1985No. 83-875, 83-943PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

The two defendants were jointly charged on identical two-count informations. They were then jointly tried and each convicted of two separate robberies that occurred on the same evening. They do not complain of being charged together. See State v. Snodgrass, 346 N.W.2d 472, 475 (Iowa 1984). Rather they complain that the two robberies should have been the subject of separate trials. We agree with their contentions, reverse their convictions, and remand for new trials.

Kruse and Bair, the defendants, patronized a number of Muscatine taverns on the night of February 2, 1983. Three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. TrudoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. State v. CunhaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. State v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. State v. GeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. State v. LamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. State v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API