Legal Opinion
State v. Lam
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-788PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGIVERIN, Justice.
Defendant Ronald Lam was found guilty by a jury of two counts of second degree burglary in violation of Iowa Code sections 713.1 and 713.5 (1983). Because he also was alleged and shown to be an habitual offender, Iowa Code section 902.8, the trial court sentenced defendant as an habitual offender to no more than fifteen years imprisonment on each count and ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. Iowa Code §§ 901.8 and 902.9(2). Defendant appealed, raising five assignments of error. We affirm.
This is a companion case to State v. Holland, 389 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1986),…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- State of Iowa v. Brent Michael RomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. OetkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
- State v. ElstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.