Legal Opinion

Shimko v. Marks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1993No. CA-9322PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gwin, Presiding Judge.

Defendants-appellants, Teresa and Dave Marks, appeal from the judgment entered in the Canton Municipal Court ordering them to vacate a residence at 1124 Piedmont Street Northeast, Canton, in a forcible entry and detainer action instituted by plaintiff-appellee, William Shimko. Appellants assign as error:

“I. The trial court erred in its conclusion that no land contract exists between the parties.
“II. The trial court erred in its conclusion that plaintiff-appellee’s acceptance of the August 1992 payment was not a waiver of the R.C. § 1923.04 notice to leave the premises.”

FA…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Associated Estates Corp. v. BartellOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Phillips v. May, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Bear v. TroyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Gollihue v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Lovejoy v. DielOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Urban Partnership Bank v. Mosezit Academy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API