Legal Opinion
Shimko v. Marks
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1993No. CA-9322PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gwin, Presiding Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Teresa and Dave Marks, appeal from the judgment entered in the Canton Municipal Court ordering them to vacate a residence at 1124 Piedmont Street Northeast, Canton, in a forcible entry and detainer action instituted by plaintiff-appellee, William Shimko. Appellants assign as error:
“I. The trial court erred in its conclusion that no land contract exists between the parties.
“II. The trial court erred in its conclusion that plaintiff-appellee’s acceptance of the August 1992 payment was not a waiver of the R.C. § 1923.04 notice to leave the premises.”
FA…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Delfino v. Paul Davies Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
- Associated Estates Corp. v. BartellOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Phillips v. May, Unpublished Decision (11-5-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bear v. TroyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Gollihue v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lovejoy v. DielOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Urban Partnership Bank v. Mosezit Academy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.