Associated Estates Corp. v. Bartell
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.
Laura Bartell, defendant-appellant, is a tenant who has resided with her three and one-half-year-old daughter at Lakeshore Village Apartments in Cleveland since October 1981. Lakeshore Village Apartments, which consists of one hundred eight units, is heavily federally subsidized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) since it houses low-income families and disabled persons under age sixty-two.
In February 1983, defendant entered into a one-year written lease with Associated Estates Corporation, plaintiff-appellee. Defendant was required to pay $7 monthly rent while HUD paid…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Minkovitz v. FineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Housing Authority v. SaylorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF DeKALB COUNTY v. PyrtleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Fireproof Warehouse & StorageOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sternberg v. WashingtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nealy v. Southlawn Palms Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Shimko v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Moon v. Spring Creek ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. YoungerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gary Crim, Inc. v. RiosOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.