Legal Opinion

Roper v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1987No. 8719SC528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs sole question on appeal is “did the trial court commit reversible error by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and by denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment?” Both plaintiff and defendants agree summary judgment was appropriate pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c), because there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Plaintiff contends, however, the summary judgment should have been in her favor.

In this case, the grantor of real property attempted to retain a testamentary power of appointment. When Myrtle conveyed the tract of land to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Cline v. ClineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Brown v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roper v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API