Legal Opinion

Cline v. Cline

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1979No. 74PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

We consider first defendant-appellee’s contention, brought to this Court in his brief under App. R. 16(a), that plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish either a resulting or a constructive trust, and that the trial court erred therefore in denying his motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. See Investment Properties v. Allen, 281 N.C. 174, 188 S.E. 2d 441 (1972).

The evidence in this case would permit the jury to find the following facts:(1) After the death of defendant’s father, defendant’s mother was unable to farm their land and to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Miller v. RoseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Wimmer v. WimmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API