Legal Opinion
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Hoornaar
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 5, 2014No. Case No. 13-C-1020PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.
Defendants Andre van Hoornaar (“van Hoornaar”) and his wife, Astrid Groenveld, (collectively the “Defendants”) obtained a mortgage from Plaintiff PNC Bank, N.A’s (“PNC”) predecessor on property located at 131 25th Avenue, Kenosha, Wisconsin (the “Property”). PNC filed a foreclosure action in state circuit court. (ECF No. 10-1) The Defendants removed the action to this District invoking diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.1 Van Hoornaar filed Counterclaims against PNC, which are styled as class action claims: breach of contract…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tennant v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Vinal v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Jordan v. Nationstar Mortg., LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Jordan v. Nationstar Mortg., LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Jordan v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2016