Legal Opinion

Koester v. Weber, Cohn & Riley, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1989No. 1-88-2024PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Plaintiff, John W. Koester, appeals from the dismissal of his action for breach of oral agreement, interference with prospective economic advantage, misappropriation of property, and fraud. Defendants Weber, Cohn & Riley, Inc., and Brown and Portillo, Inc., cross-appeal from the denial of their motion for sanctions against plaintiff for the filing of his second amended complaint. In dispute is the applicability of the parol evidence rule in the interpretation of a document entitled “Model Release.”

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint alleged that Weber, Brown’s advertising agency, orally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. LandfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Lewis v. Loyola University of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Perkaus v. Chicago Catholic High School Athletic LeagueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 v. Village of FrankfortAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Midwest Builder Distributing, Inc. v. Lord and Essex, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Wright v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Shea v. Preservation Chicago, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Bruner v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Geoquest Productions, Ltd. v. Embassy Home EntertainmentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API