Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Landfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1960No. 35639PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

Jay H. Schmidt and Sidney Schmidt, father and son, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against Herman Landfield, seeking damages for fraud allegedly perpetrated by defendant in certain real-estate dealings between the parties. After answer and reply were filed, the court granted a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Court, where the judgment was affirmed. (Schmidt v. Landfield, 23 Ill. App. 2d 55.) We have granted plaintiffs’ petition for leave to appeal to this court.

Defendant’s motion in the circuit court was made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roda v. BerkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Dillman v. NadlehofferIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Dickinson v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bundesen v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Morel v. MasalskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Thomas P. Davis and Cathy M. Davis v. G.N. Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Sabrina Roppo v. Travelers Commercial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API