Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Richards & Carrier, Booth & Bartnett, W. J. Bartnett, and Gray & Cooper, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, a judgment creditor of La Serena Land and Water Company, a corporation, brought this action against the corporation and certain holders of its capital stock to recover from the individual defendants the unpaid subscriptions on their stock and to apply the same in satisfaction of his judgment. The plaintiff had brought an action against the corporation to foreclose a mortgage, and obtained a decree of foreclosure. (SeeBlood v. La Serena L. and W. Co., 113 Cal, 221, [41 P. 1017, 45 P. 252]; s.c., 134 Cal. 361, [66 P. 317].) The mortgaged property sold for an amount less than was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Roberts v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Schroeter v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Engles v. ShafferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Barnard v. McIntireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919