Schroeter v. Abbott
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County denying applications for change of place of trial. J. W. Curtis, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The appellants above named were joined with numerous other defendants in an action to recover unpaid subscriptions to capital stock of a corporation, the Gibraltar Investment & Home Building Company, which action was begun in the superior court of the county of San Bernardino. They have prosecuted separate appeals from orders of the court denying their individual applications for change of venue to the county of Los Angeles, where they reside.
As the two appeals are identical in the law and the facts involved, they are here disposed of together.
The grounds of the motion for change of place of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Kelley v. GillSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Bailey v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dean v. ShingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kahle v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Manter v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Crocker v. GentryOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Southern California Edison Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969