In Re the Appeal From the Denial of the Application to Dredge
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Six questions are presented for our consideration. The first issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in failing to dismiss the applicant’s appeal to that court due to a failure to properly serve notice of appeal on the opposing party. The Court of Appeals did not address this issue. Nevertheless, “[a] party who was an appellee in the Court of Appeals and is an appellant in the Supreme Court [Rugumak, Ltd.] may present in his brief . . . any questions which, pursuant to Rule 28(c), he properly presented for reivew to the Court of Appeals.” Rule 16(a), Rules of Appellate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Federal Communications Commission v. Midwest Video Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Jones v. KellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Shaver v. N. C. Monroe Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Armstrong v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.