Epstein v. Ratkosky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Schaffee,
This litigation is between father and daughter; the father is plaintiff, the daughter, defendant and appellant.
The essential facts out of which the case arises are these: The father purchased a store property; he paid $12,000 for it, $7,500 in cash and assumed two mortgages amounting to $4,500. The property represented substantially all his possessions. The daughter was not present when he made the settlement; he directed that the deed should be made to her, which was done. She admits she paid none of the consideration, that her father paid it all. On the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dorman v. DormanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Phillips v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
- Schermer v. WilmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gassner v. GassnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Hartley v. HartleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gray v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Fitzpatrick v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Keck v. VandykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Hiestand v. GeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.