Legal Opinion
Showers v. Rober
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1928No. Docket No. 5257PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in the sum of $1,250 rendered against her in an action in which plaintiff sued for a commission alleged to have been earned in negotiating the sale of defendant’s real estate. On November 16, 1923, defendant gave to' plaintiff written authorization to sell the land in question, in which it is stated: “I hereby constitute Jack Showers Sole Agents for the herein described property for 30 days and thereafter until notified in writing-to the contrary.” The price stated was $25,000, of which $16,300 was to be cash (“down”), and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betts v. Southern California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- California Land Security Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McCartney v. Clover Valley Land & Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Grummet v. Fresno Glazed Cement Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Richardson v. Walter Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Born v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Kaufmann v. NilanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.