Kaufmann v. Nilan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendant owned an apartment house located at 1265 Washington Street, San Francisco. Plaintiffs, Kaufmann and Warda, are real estate brokers, operating as a partnership. On August 23, 1956, defendant executed a standard “Uniform Authorization to Sell,” designating plaintiffs as the exclusive agents, until October 30, 1956, to sell the property for $98,500 and agreeing to pay them a commission of 5 per cent thereof in the event of a sale. Plaintiffs found a buyer but defendant refused to sell. Thereupon, plaintiffs sued defendant for their commission and recovered a judgment for $4,925, from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Higson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Covino Agency, Inc. v. ChristensenConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- E. A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- (PC) Witkin v. LotersztainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Inv. Brokerage Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994