Legal Opinion

Kaufmann v. Nilan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1962No. [Civ. 20127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Defendant owned an apartment house located at 1265 Washington Street, San Francisco. Plaintiffs, Kaufmann and Warda, are real estate brokers, operating as a partnership. On August 23, 1956, defendant executed a standard “Uniform Authorization to Sell,” designating plaintiffs as the exclusive agents, until October 30, 1956, to sell the property for $98,500 and agreeing to pay them a commission of 5 per cent thereof in the event of a sale. Plaintiffs found a buyer but defendant refused to sell. Thereupon, plaintiffs sued defendant for their commission and recovered a judgment for $4,925, from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Higson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Covino Agency, Inc. v. ChristensenConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
  3. E. A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. (PC) Witkin v. LotersztainDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Inv. Brokerage Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API