Legal Opinion

Home Fire Insurance v. Fallon

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1895No. 5882PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from the district court of Holt county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The defendant in error was the owner of certain grain in a warehouse in O’Neill. The warehouse and grain were destroyed by fire January 6,1892. The defendant in error held a policy of $1,200 in the Home Fire Insurance Company on this grain, and February 1, 1892, brought this action to recover on the policy. He obtained judgment, and the insurance company brings the case here on error.

Plaintiff in error argues in its brief several questions in. regard to the admission of evidence. The only assignments of error relating to the subject are as follows: “2. For errors committed on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. CaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Omaha Fire Insurance v. Dierks & WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cobb v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Phenix Ins. v. BachelderNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. German Insurance & Savings Institution v. KlineNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Jensen v. Palatine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. German Insurance v. FrederickNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Scott v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API