Legal Opinion

Cronin v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2011No. 06-633PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*269OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending is plaintiffs motion for partial judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Plaintiffs motion is limited to the issue of whether the tolling provision of the Service-members’ Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) brings plaintiffs claims within this court’s six-year statute of limitations. Also pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) based on the alleged untimeliness of plaintiffs suit. The motions are fully briefed and we heard oral argument on February 28, 2011.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Le Maistre v. LeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Cronin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. Cronin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Cronin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API