Legal Opinion
Nat'l Veterans Legal Servs. Program v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–745 (ESH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
The federal judiciary's Public Access to Court Electronic Records ("PACER") system, which is managed by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts ("AO"), provides the public with online access to the electronic records of federal court cases. The fees for using PACER are established by the Judicial Conference of the United States Courts and set forth in the judiciary's Electronic Public Access ("EPA") Fee Schedule. In this class action, users of the PACER system contend that the fees charged from 2010 to 2016 violated federal law,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nat'l Veterans Legal Servs. Program v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Woodhull Freedom Found. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- NVLSP v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.