Worth, Dennis R. v. Jackson, Alphonso
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Three inter-related judicial doctrines— standing, mootness, and ripeness — ensure that federal courts assert jurisdiction only over “Cases” and “Controversies.” U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2. In a rare justiciability hat trick, this case implicates all three. At issue is a white male employee’s challenge to a government agency’s affirmative action policy that allegedly deprives him of the opportunity to compete for job openings on an even playing field. The employee makes two claims, but we have jurisdiction over neither. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. U.S. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Jeong Seon Han v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Devia v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.