State v. Bigelow

This is an appeal from a conviction for cruelty to animals. We affirm.

Appellant complains that in the decision filed by the court, there is no finding that the animals in question were confined. However, no request for such a finding, pursuant to Rule 23(c), HRPP, appears in the record. That being so, the general finding of guilt in the decision was sufficient. Compare State v. Alsip, 2 Haw. App. 259, 630 P.2d 126 (1981).

Insofar as the appeal is a contention that the general finding of guilt by the court was unsupported by the evidence, the answer is that there is no transcript before us from…