State v. Alsip
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
PADGETT, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction of the offense of robbery in the second degree. The trial was jury-waived.
Essentially two points are urged by the appellant as bases for reversal. The first is that there was insufficient evidence to justify the denial of his motion for acquittal and the second is that certain statements made by the court in the course of a colloquy between court and counsel during argument were specific findings of fact which were either improperly judicially noticed or erroneous. We do not agree with appellant on either point and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HernandezHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. RuizHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
- Almeida v. CorreaHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. MatsudaHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NapoleonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. BigelowHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. MinerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. PereiraHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009