Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Payne

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock county; the Hon. Joseph Sibley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAllister

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Adams circuit court, rendered in an action brought under the act of 1853, by appellee, as administrator of Albert Y. Payne, deceased, against appellant, to recover, for the benefit of the next of kin of deceased, the damages resulting from his death, which was caused, as it is alleged, by the wrongful acts, neglect and default of appellant’s servants.

The general grounds relied upon for reversal are: 1st, error in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial; 2d, error both as to giving and refusing instructions.

The first of these grounds is narrowed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. PayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Calumet Iron & Steel Co. v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bonato v. Peabody Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. McMahon v. SankeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. North Chicago Street Railroad v. ZeigerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API