Legal Opinion

United States v. Krenn

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 23, 1981No. CM 440224PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JONES, Senior Judge:

Through a series of errors by legal and correctional authorities, the appellant served his entire sentence to confinement (less good time) at the United States Disciplinary Barracks rather than at the United States Army Retraining Brigade which was designated by the convening authority as the place of confinement. Appellant asserts that he was prejudiced by this error and asks that his sentence be set aside. The Government disagrees and responds with alternative theories of why appellant is due no relief.

I

An outline of the facts giving rise to this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. LarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. BrowndUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. Reed v. OhmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SchmitU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. PrestoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API