Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Hellwig

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1945No. File No. 8739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

In this action plaintiff sought strict foreclosure of a contract for deed under SDC 37.31. The defenant interposed an answer and a counterclaim. By way of defense, the answer alleged that the plaintiff failed to tender an abstract showing merchantable title. The counterclaim sought specific performance. The court entered judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint, and awarding specific performance with a deduction of $150 from the agreed purchase price as the estimated cost 'of an action to quiet the title. Plaintiff has appealed.

The controversy is over the effect of a deed in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Mitchell v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Manning v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Mustain v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Weber v. NedinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hennigh v. HennighMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bunt v. FairbanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schimke v. KarlstadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Baldenecker v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Moxley v. VaughnMontana Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API