Legal Opinion

Schimke v. Karlstad

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1973No. File 11240PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Chief Justice.

The facts as stipulated show plaintiff and his wife purchased the property involved in this action, and the deed conveyed title to them “as Joint Tenants and not as Tenants in common and with full Right of Survivorship”; that prior to her death, without knowledge and consent of plaintiff, plaintiff’s wife conveyed an undivided one-half interest in the property to her children by a former marriage. Plaintiff brought this action claiming that deed void for the reason that he had a contingent remainder in fee which was indestructible by the voluntary act of the joint…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buford v. DahlkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In Re Baker's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bassler v. RewodlinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Davidson v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jamestown Terminal Elevator, Inc. v. KnoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Renz v. RenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re ChinosornUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. In Re the Estate of HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Martinson v. HolsoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API