Legal Opinion

Holderfield v. Deen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1959No. 6 Div. 347PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the circuit court of Jefferson County granting defendants’ motion for a new trial in a personal injury action. In granting the motion the trial court did not specify which ground or grounds of the motion it thought justified its ruling. Among the 38 grounds are several taking the point that the verdict is not sustained by the great preponderance of the evidence.

The case went to the jury on count C, the essential averments of which charge defendants, as owners of a house, with negligence in voluntarily undertaking to repair…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Finney v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chestang v. Tensaw Land & Timber CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Lee v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Deen v. HolderfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Mullinax v. HufhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Birmingham, Inc. v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API