Legal Opinion

Turner v. City of North Platte

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1979No. 42283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from the dismissal by the District Court of plaintiffs’ petition in error. The plaintiffs-appellants are the owners of property abutting West “E” Street in the defendant City of North Platte. The petition in error was. filed after the city council, sitting as a board of equalization, levied special assessments for improvements to West “E” Street. The special assessments were levied pursuant to Nebraska’s “gap and extend” law, sections 18-2001 to 18-2005, R. R. S. 1943. Briefly stated, it is the position of the plaintiffs that the “gap and extend” procedure may be used only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Leavitt v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Matzke v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Harmon v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jordan v. LSF8 Master Participation TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Foote Clinic, Inc. v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Garden Development Co. v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Iverson v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Braden v. Yuma County Board SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API