Legal Opinion

Garden Development Co. v. City of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1989No. 87-009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moran, D.J.

The City of Hastings, defendant, appeals a decision of the Adams County District Court invalidating a special assessment levied by the Hastings city council for improvements made in a water extension district created under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 19-2402 (Reissue 1987) against real property owned by Garden Development Company, a partnership, plaintiff. On Garden Development’s appeal of the assessment, the district court, after a trial de novo, found Garden Development’s property was served and benefited by the municipal water system as it existed prior to the creation of the water…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matzke v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Lincoln County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Turner v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. First Assembly of God Church v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foote Clinic, Inc. v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bennett v. Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Purdy v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Iverson v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Downtown Rutland Special Tax Challengers v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API