Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Stone

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1916No. L. A. No. 4955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County admitting a will to probate. Fred H. Taft, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken by Leo Stone Green. The first ground of the motion was that the transcript on appeal, which has now been filed, was not filed within the time prescribed by our rules. As to this ground, at the oral argument we announced that a sufficient showing had been made to warrant us in holding that the appellant’s failure in this regard should be excused. Consideration of the affidavits allowed to be filed by the respective parties since the argument has not changed our views in this regard. As to certain matters referred to in these affidavits…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Demens v. HueneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API