Legal Opinion
Washington Exchange Bank v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 1, 1919No. 9634PublishedCited by 5 opinions
(Certiorari granted by the Supreme Court.) Complaint; from Wilkes superior court-r-Judge Walker. November 20,1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.
1. This court can not say that the admission in evidence of the deed from B. M. Smith to Sallie L. G. Smith was error. The only objection made at the time -of its admission was that it was “inadmissible.” This objection was too general and indefinite. Some specific ground or reason why it was inadmissible should have been stated.
2. Hnder the agreed statement of facts, the court, passing by consent upon all questions both of law and fact, did not err in finding and adjudging that the $5,000 note was the only note sued on which was secured by deed, and that the $447 note was not so secured. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- McLeod v. HendrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Southern Life Insurance v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Irwin v. AskewSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Rosedofsky v. CorosaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
- Neal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- State ex rel. Zickefoose v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
- Washington Exchange Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920