Legal Opinion

School District No. 1 v. Dauchy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 15, 1857PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Assumpsit. The declaration contained a special count for the non-performance of a contract by the defendant to build a school-house for the plaintiffs, and the money counts. The defendant, on the 7th day of December, 1853, made a contract in writing with the plaintiffs to build the schoolhouse for the sum of $2,469, and to complete the same by the first Monday of May, 1854; a part of the price to be paid by installments as the work progressed.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit. The declaration contained a special count for the non-performance of a contract by the defendant to build a school-house for the plaintiffs, and the money counts. The defendant, on the 7th day of December, 1853, made a contract in writing with the plaintiffs to build the schoolhouse for the sum of $2,469, and to complete the same by the first Monday of May, 1854; a part of the price to be paid by installments as the work progressed. The defendant commenced the building of the same, and had nearly completed it, when, on the 27th day of April, 1854, it was struck by lightning, and…

1Opinion of the CourtEllsworth, J.

It is not important, whether we consider the question in this case as arising out of the objection to the defendant’s evidence, or out of the charge to the jury. The question is the same in either case, and it is this. Was *535the defendant discharged from his contract to complete and deliver the said school-house by the time agreed, the first Monday of May, 1854, by reason of the fact, that just before that day it was burnt and wholly destroyed by lightning ?

There is no dispute as to the terms of the contract, nor as to their import and force. The defendant did agree absolutely and…

2Cited by64 opinions

  1. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Tompkins v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API