Legal Opinion
Newcastle Products, Inc. v. School Dist. of Blair Tp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 8, 1936No. 8432PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McVICAR, District Judge.’
This is an action to recover compensatory and punitive damages by reason of an alleged unlawful conversion by defendant of plaintiff’s goods and materials. The case is now before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reason that the jurisdictional amount required by law does not appear in- the averments of the statement of claim.
In the statement of claim it is averred that the plaintiff is a corporation of the State of Indiana; that the defendant is a school district located within this district; that on August 2, 1932, the president and secretary of- the board…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Ogg v. City of LansingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Wilson v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hayes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Scott v. Abilene Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1977