Legal Opinion

Spokane Security Finance Co. v. Crowley Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1929No. 21341. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

After the departmental opinion in this ease (Spokane Security Finance Co. v. Crowley Lum. Co., 150 Wash. 559, 274 Pac. 102) was filed, a petition for rehearing was presented and granted. In the opinion of the department, after holding that a mortgagee of chattels may maintain an action of trover for conversion of the mortgaged property, the case of Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Gowan, 24 Wash. 66, 63 Pac. 1111, which held that, where a chattel mortgage gave the mortgagee the right, in the case of default in payment, to take possession of the goods, such possession could be enforced by an action of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. German-American State Bank v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Roche Fruit & Produce Co. v. VaughtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Nettleton v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Spokane Security Finance Co. v. Crowley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GowanWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bunn v. WalchWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muscatel v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Parks v. Yakima Valley Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Raymond Bros. Impact Pulverizer Co. v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API