Legal Opinion
Cashmere Valley Bank v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided June 28, 1940No. 51PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought action in the Superior Court of Washington on three causes of action. A summary of the essential allegations follows:
The complaint, composed of three causes of action, each the same, except for the parties, dates and subject matter, sounds in conversion. The first cause of action, representative of all three, is, in short, as follows:
The plaintiff, a commercial bank in the Wenatchee valley, on March 3, 1937, made a loan to Ethelwyn Casebeer, secured by a crop mortgage upon her 1937 crop of -apples. The crop mortgage was filed as required by…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Hechinger Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Tel-Mor Garage CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Rake v. City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1967