McDonnell & McDonnell v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
The taxpayers, respondents in these consolidated causes, have challenged the action of the State Tax Commission in imposing a business and occupation tax *554respecting manufacturing activity as defined in RCW 82.04-.120, and have petitioned for a refund of taxes paid thereunder.
The State Tax Commission has taken the position that the preparation or processing of dried split peas by the taxpayers comes within the scope of the definition of “manufacturing activity,” as set forth in the aforementioned statute. The trial judge sustained the taxpayers’ contentions that their activities did not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Bornstein Sea Foods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Mathewson v. PrimeauWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Bain v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Valley Fruit v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.