Legal Opinion

Valley Fruit v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 28, 1998No. Nos. 16906-5-III; 16960-0-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.

Valley Fruit and Douglas Fruit applied for a sales and use tax exemption. The Department of Revenue denied both applications; the Board of Tax Appeals upheld the denials. In separate actions, the Yakima County Superior Court and the Franklin County Superior Court reversed the Board of Tax Appeals and granted summary judgment in favor of the fruit companies. The Department of Revenue appeals. We affirm.

Douglas Fruit and Valley Fruit (referred to as the “fruit companies”) constructed apple packing and storage facilities. The apple packing process begins with whole, edible apples which are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Inland Empire Distribution Systems, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. William Dickson Co. v. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Bornstein Sea Foods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dodge City Saloon, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Potter v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Potter v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Steven Klein, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Dodge City Saloon v. State Liquor ControlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API