Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bormack

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 In this appeal we consider, inter alia, the admission of expert testimony regarding human memory and perception in the context of eyewitness identification. After careful analysis of the issues and the relevant case law, we affirm.

¶ 2 The evidence presented by the Commonwealth at trial revealed the following. Seventeen-year-old John Gallagher was an assistant manager at Eckerd Drugs in Drexel Hill, Delaware County. In August 2000 he was working at the store and engaged in emptying the cash register and an extra cash drop box. He walked from the front of the store to the back carrying the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. TrinidadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Abdul-Salaam v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API