Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Heagy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 1964No. Nos. 63-107, 63-111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, defendants in a personal injury action, seek review of an order granting a new trial which contained several grounds, one of which was: “ * * * that the Plaintiffs did not receive a fair and impartial trial from a fair and impartial jury, and that the jury was swayed by outside influence 1 beyond the control of the Court. This was recognized in the context of the adversary proceedings and the oversight in not specially charging the jury must be considered as being prejudicial error.”

Appellate courts are much more reluctant to interfere with an order granting a new trial than an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Berkman v. Miami National BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Ridarsick v. AmirkanianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Simpson v. ClayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Policari v. CerbasiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Iowa Home Mutual Casualty Co. v. Underwriters Management Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API