Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Clay

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 21, 1962No. 2423PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 So.2d 494 (1962)

Richard SIMPSON, Individually and As a Partner, and N.D. Simpson, Individually and As a Partner, D/B/a Simpson Motors, a Co-Partnership, and Albert Smith, Appellants,

v.

Donald R. CLAY, a Minor, by R.M. Clay, His Next Friend, and R.M. Clay, Individually, Appellees.

No. 2423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

March 21, 1962.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 1962.

Monroe E. McDonald, Sanders, McEwan, Schwarz & Mims, Orlando, for appellants.

Charles M. McCarty, of McCarty & Bates, and Linton S. Waterhouse, Orlando, for appellees.

2Per curiam

The defendants have appealed an order…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Utley v. Southern Metal Products Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Kraus v. OsteenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc. v. GagerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. HowarthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. State v. StricklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Dorvil v. Purolator Courier Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Huffman v. HeagyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API