Legal Opinion

Berkman v. Miami National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 10, 1962No. 61-683PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

143 So.2d 535 (1962)

Samuel R. BERKMAN and Arthur Siegel, Appellants,

v.

MIAMI NATIONAL BANK, a United States Banking Association; Florida Carlsbad, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Rudolph T. Wagner; Milton Hoff, and the Dublin Co., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 61-683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 10, 1962.

Rehearing Denied August 22, 1962.

Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin, Miami, for appellants.

Frank & Weston and Peter Strelkow, Miami Beach, for Dublin Co.

Burton Harrison, Miami, for Miami Nat. Bank.

Glasel, Meyer & Leben, Hollywood, for Florida Carlsbad, Inc.

Hugh M.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Plant Board v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Sedell v. SedellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Johnson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. City of Miami v. HollisSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. In re FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Tiny's Liquors, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Wingreen Company v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Peerless Insurance Co. v. Sun Line Helicopters, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. GORDON INTERNAT'L ADV., INC. v. Charlotte County L. & T. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API