Legal Opinion

United States v. Simon Hawthorne

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 18, 1976No. 75-1549, 75-1727PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from the defendant’s guilty plea asserts error in the denial of a pre-plea motion and attacks the validity of the sentence imposed. We conclude on the authority of Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973), that the defendant’s guilty plea forecloses our consideration of his pre-plea motion. However, holding that the district court’s sentence was infirm under North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), we vacate and remand for re-sentencing.

I

In May, 1973 a federal grand jury…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip CimminoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer and William Anderson, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. United States v. Louis GillissCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Terry Dennis PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API