Legal Opinion

City of Bristol v. Vogelsonger

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 29, 1990No. 8002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

This appeal arises out of condemnation proceedings commenced by the plaintiff, the city of Bristol (the city), against the defendant landowners (the defendants).1 The defendants appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment2 and its appointment of three disinterested appraisers to assess the value of their properties that were the subject of the condemnation proceedings.

The city had conducted studies to determine what measures would be necessary to maintain an adequate water supply for the city over the next century. On the basis of those studies, it concluded…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Mazur v. BlumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Brennan v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Ficara v. O'ConnorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API